Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Sign In
Advancing the public health workforce to achieve organizational excellence
Kaye Bender: What is the relationship between accreditation and quality improvement in public health?

Date: 12/28/2010 2:29 PM

Related Categories: Performance Management and Quality Improvement (PMQI)

Topic: Infrastructure, Performance Management and Quality Improvement

Tag: Accreditation, Infrastructure, Performance Management

Kaye Bender, PhD, RN, FAAN, President and CEO, Public Health Accreditation Board

PHAB is using the definition of quality improvement in public health that was developed by the Accreditation Coalition and published in the Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (January/February, 2010). Specifically, that definition states that quality improvement in public health is:

A continuous and ongoing effort to achieve measurable improvements in the efficiency, effectiveness, performance, accountability, outcomes and other indicators of quality of services or processes that achieve equity and improve the health of the community.

In that same article, the difference between “small QI” and “large QI” are described.  “Small” quality improvement efforts are often focused at the program or activity level, and are a great way to learn a specific model. “Large” quality improvement efforts are conducted organization-wide and are system focused. Public health can be transformed through the adoption of a comprehensive approach to QI where it becomes incorporated into everything the health department does rather than a separate set of activities.  Adopting a quality improvement culture allows a health department to:

•    Set focus on a vital few priorities
•    Create a sense of urgency for measurable results and a culture of quality
•    Engage every employee
•    Build QI time into daily workload
•    Adopt fact-based decision making
•    Reward and celebrate progress

PHAB recognizes that learning about quality improvement models and language is new for many health departments. And yet, it is the cornerstone upon which accreditation is based. It’s not about the accreditation certificate; it’s about the focus on learning to do what we do better and sharing that knowledge with others.

Please share with us your thoughts and opinions on this and other hot public health topics by posting and subscribing to comments throughout PHF’s new website. 
 
The PHF Pulse Blog welcomes conversations and commentary from contributors. Posts may not necessarily reflect the views of Public Health Foundation.

Comments

Add A Comment

Ron Bialek

12/30/2010

Budget cuts throughout government have made it more important than ever to ensure that we are doing the best we can possibly do with the funds we receive. Accreditation, with its focus on quality improvement, can help provide this assurance to the public, policymakers, and ourselves.

Subscribe to PHF